club_cafe: Investment Club Operations Handbook
HelpRegister |
club_cafe: Investment Club Operations Handbook In a message dated 10/28/2007 11:04:18 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
nycpartners@bivio.com writes:
I was reading the Investment Club Operations Handbook We have a letter that states that the new member has received a copy of the
partnership agreement and agrees to be bound by its terms. The new member signs
that letter and the letter is attached to the original PA.
It wouldn't be a taxable event under your scenario and you are missing
somethin. There are two types of activities which lead to taxes: actions taken
by the club, which affect all members, and actions taken by one (or more)
members which affect only them. Actions taken by a member are reported on the
withdrawal report, and the actions taken by the club are reported on Schedule
K-1 each year. What you are missing is that each member's cost (tax) basis is
adjusted by the net profit or loss reported on the K-1. Looking at your example
above, if the member also had a 25% return in one year (each member's return is
not necessarily the same as the club's due to differences in deposit
timing/amounts), when the investments were sold, his taxable basis would adjust
upward to $12.50/unit. The withdrawal would show no taxable gain. On the other
hand, if the club didn't sell any of its investments but had cash on hand to
fund the withdrawal, the K-1 would show no reportable income, but the withdrawal
would show a taxable gain of $2.50/unit. Net result, there is no double
counting.
Ira Smilovitz Could a club have a signature line with a line to show the date signed by each individual member? Danny Matthews
Boo! Scare away worms, viruses and so much more! Try Windows Live OneCare! Try now! > (2) In terms of taxes, the handbook says when a > member > withdrawals, the withdrawal itself is a taxable event based > on > their cost basis. But, this does not make sense to me > because all > gain/losses, interest, dividends, etc are > already being passed through to > the individual members based > on their proportional ownership. It > seems this would be > double counting. For example, if a club had a 25% > return in > year one and sold all investments and went to cash, the > unit > value would rise from $10 to $12.50. The gains would > be > passed through proportionately. If a member withdrew, why > would > the increase from $10 to $12.50 be a taxable event > when the underlying > securities transactions have already > been accounted for on the K-1? > Am I missing something? > > It wouldn't be a taxable event under your scenario and you are missing > somethin. There are two types of activities which lead to taxes: actions taken > by the club, which affect all members, and actions taken by one (or more) > members which affect only them. Actions taken by a member are reported on the > withdrawal report, and the actions taken by the club are reported on Schedule > K-1 each year. What you are missing is that each member's cost (tax) basis is > adjusted by the net profit or loss reported on the K-1. Looking at your example > above, if the member also had a 25% return in one year (each member's return is > not necessarily the same as the club's due to differences in deposit > timing/amounts), when the investments were sold, his taxable basis would adjust > upward to $12.50/unit. The withdrawal would show no taxable gain. On the other > hand, if the club didn't sell any of its investments but had cash on hand to > fund the withdrawal, the K-1 would show no reportable income, but the withdrawal > would show a taxable gain of $2.50/unit. Net result, there is no double > counting. Thanks, this is really helpful. In the latter scenario (club has cash on hand to fund withdrawal), how is that recorded on the K-1? Is it "sale of investment club unit"? Secondly, does it affect the remaing members in any way? Would their taxable basis adjust downward to reflect the realizing by the withdrawing member? Thanks. |
|