400 transaction limit per annum for AccountSync
HelpRegister |
400 transaction limit per annum for AccountSync My thread titled "15 month free trial with 400 transactions" has turned into a discussion of delinquent members and late fees, so I'm starting a new thread to address some of Bob Hooper's questions. These are not in the order in which he asked them. "How do we find out how many transactions we have accumulated from the beginning of our subscription?" At your club site, go to "administration", then to the "Subscription" tab. Ours says "Your AccountSync subscription ends on 01/06/2008. Your club currently has 338 / 400 transactions for the current subscription. Click here to upgrade to ActivePartnership." "Where on the bivio site is the 400 limit quoted?" The limit of 400/year for AccountSync is not on any documentation page I can find. The place mentioned above is where I found it. "What constitutes a transaction?" We have 2 accounts for our club, a bank account and a brokerage account. If I go to accounting/Accounts, each has a link next to it titled "transactions." I believe anything on any of these lists constitutes a transactions. This includes not only 1 for each stock purchase and sale, but 1 for each member deposit, 1 for each dividend paid, 1 (or 2?) for each transfer between the 2 accounts, 1 for each monthly interest payment on the broker cash account, and so forth. The bivio documentation does not offer a definition of what constitutes a transaction, as far as I can tell. Transaction Limit is discussed in the Help file at: http://www.bivio.com/hp/transaction-limit.html It references the Service Overview at: http://www.bivio.com/hm/services.html Neither of these mentions the 400/year limit. (I wonder if the limit is legally binding, if not documented anywhere?) By the way, my original question was that our club is having trouble renewing its AccountSync subscription after 12 months, instead of upgrading to ActivePartnership. Help on that topic would be welcome. Mike Carroll VistosoVIP On 9/29/07, Michael Carroll wrote: > "Where on the bivio site is the 400 limit quoted?" > > The limit of 400/year for AccountSync is not on any > documentation page I can find. The place mentioned above is > where I found it. We apologize. This was removed accidentally when we merged the Club Accounting and AccountSync documentation. The WayBackMachine tells all: http://web.archive.org/web/20061017003139/http://www.bivio.com/hm/club-accounting.html We will correct oversight this shortly. BTW, the free trial does not have a transaction limit. > The bivio documentation does not offer a definition of what > constitutes a transaction, as far as I can tell. We document the meaning of the term "transaction" throughout our help section. It's pretty much a standard accounting term. If someone deposits a check, that's a transaction. Interest, dividends, buying stock, etc. are all transactions. > By the way, my original question was that our club is having > trouble renewing its AccountSync subscription after 12 > months, instead of upgrading to ActivePartnership. Help on > that topic would be welcome. Please contact support@bivio.com, and I'm sure we'll be able to help you. For those of you who are worried about your transaction limit, please be aware that 90%+ of bivio clubs fall under the 400 transaction limit. This is how the limit was chosen. We want to keep our accounting services as cheap as possible for ordinary investment clubs, and charge more for those clubs and funds which consume more of our resources. Cheers, Rob Is a reinvested dividend one or two transactions. The money received and then the reivestment of that money? Danny Matthews > Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 18:01:12 -0600 > From: nagler@bivio.biz > We document the meaning of the term "transaction" throughout our help > section. It's pretty much a standard accounting term. If someone > deposits a check, that's a transaction. Interest, dividends, buying > stock, etc. are all transactions. Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger Get it now! On 9/29/07, danny matthews <danny.matthews@hotmail.com> wrote: > Is a reinvested dividend one or two transactions. The money received and > then the reivestment of that money? I believe that if you enter it manually, it's one transaction. If it is entered automaically, it is two transactions. As a part of The One Minute Treasurer(tm) system, we recommend you do away with re-invested dividends for two reasons: automatic investing is not thoughtful investing and managing lots of tiny stock transactions is unnecessary overhead. Cheers, Rob One of the core tenants of betterinvesting/NAIC is to reinvest dividends. Rob Nagler wrote: > As a part of The One Minute Treasurer(tm) system, we recommend you do > away with re-invested dividends for two reasons: automatic investing is not > thoughtful investing and managing lots of tiny stock transactions is > unnecessary overhead. > > Cheers, > Rob <<
One of the core tenants of betterinvesting/NAIC is to
reinvest dividends.
>> That 'core tenant' is often misunderstood. The
recommendation doesn't mean that you have to reinvest the dividend in the same
stock that produced it.
Rip West Saint Paul, MN >One of the core tenets of betterinvesting/NAIC is to reinvest dividends. Actually ... that's one of the more widely-held misnomers or misinterpretations of NAIC philosophy. Rule #2: Reinvest dividends and current income -- is really intended to suggest that we avoid attempts at market timing, essentially remaining fully invested within reason. In other words, there are always opportunities to identify and own quality companies with sufficient expected returns. The proof? Over the years, this guideline has been mangled into some sort of endorsement of dividend reinvestment programs when the reality is that the rule was "invented" decades before DRIP programs ever existed. So it's simply impossible for dividend reinvestment to have been the motivation for Nicholson's guideline. Rob Nagler is right. Thoughtful investing into the best stock available -- either inside or outside your portfolio -- should be what's done, and the origin of the funds available (dividends) shouldn't have anything to do with the destination unless, of course, it deserves it. Best wishes and Better Investing, Mark Robertson www.manifestinvesting.com Being a bit fussy about English I want to clarify your
comment. A TENANT is a person occupying a residence, a TENET is a
principle or doctrine.
Being a bit fussy about English I want to
clarify your comment. A TENANT is a person occupying a residence, a TENET
is a principle or doctrine.
Being a 'bit fussy' myself, I want to correct you. It
wasn't my 'comment'. Both times the word 'tenant' was used in my post, it
was clearly a direct quote from the original post. When I am quoting a
post, I don't correct their grammar or spelling.
Rip West Saint Paul, MN Rip,
I wasn't correcting you, I used your post to reply to
the original as well.
M
Sorry, of course I meant tenet. About the reinvesting into the same company: I like reinvesting in the same company, although I can certainly get behind just reinvesting in the best choice at the time. Rip West wrote: > << > One of the core tenants of betterinvesting/NAIC is to > reinvest dividends. > >> > > That 'core tenant' is often misunderstood. The > recommendation doesn't mean that you have to reinvest the dividend in the same > stock that produced it. > > Rip West > Saint Paul, > MN |
|