club_cafe: Prepaid Dues
HelpRegister |
club_cafe: Prepaid Dues In a message dated 5/9/2007 10:09:20 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
acklages@bivio.com writes:
In our club members pay dues semi-annually. All members contribute the same amount so their portfolio values should all be the same That is all dependent on the language of your club's partnership agreement.
You can do anything you want (provided it's in your PA). As an aside, I would
advise you to reconsider your buy-in provision. After the club has been in
existence for a period of time it may become too expensive for a new member to
buy-in at the current value of the other members. There is no reason to do so
since the accounting software keeps track of each member's share of earnings and
expense regardless of the ownership share.
Ira Smilovitz See what's free at AOL.com. Thanks for your input . However, that doesn't quite answer my question. Each member value is around $31,00 and we have no trouble in keeping up our membership. Out members pay $450 semi annually, I look at this way as per the following: MEMBER VALUES 1ST MONTH 2ND MONTH 3RD MONTH 4TH MONTH 5TH MONTH 6TH MONTH PORTFOLIO 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 MONTHLY DUES 75 150 225 300 375 450 PREPAID DUES 375 300 225 150 75 0 ====================================================== TOTAL VALUE 30,450 30,450 30,450 30,450 30,450 30,450 Lets say that the member value of the portfolio remains the same, $30,000 for six months. The first month $75 of the $450 is applied to the current month's dues. Each succeeding month $75 is added to the dues account and $75 is subtracted to the dues account. Therefore at any time during the six month period, the member value is $30,450. A new member buying in during that period should pay $30,450. Other members tell me that new members should also pay the prepaid portion of the dues. If you add this the new members account, he purchases extra units and his member value is more than the current members. If what they say is correct, It appears to me that the dues would have to entered as Miscellaneous Income so the number of units is not affected. What is you opinion of the above. Thanks Arthur Klages -----Original Message----- From: club_cafe@bivio.com [mailto:club_cafe@bivio.com] On Behalf Of IraS1@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 10:41 AM To: club_cafe@bivio.com Subject: Re: club_cafe: Prepaid Dues In a message dated 5/9/2007 10:09:20 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, acklages@bivio.com writes: In our club members pay dues semi-annually. All members contribute the same amount so their portfolio values should all be the same When a new member joins, he pays an amount equal to each members value as of the valuation date, which is the last day of the month. If a member comes aboard, say, after two months past the date of dues payment, does he have to pay the 4 months remaining of the prepayment, or is that already included in the member value ? If so, how is that handled ? That is all dependent on the language of your club's partnership agreement. You can do anything you want (provided it's in your PA). As an aside, I would advise you to reconsider your buy-in provision. After the club has been in existence for a period of time it may become too expensive for a new member to buy-in at the current value of the other members. There is no reason to do so since the accounting software keeps track of each member's share of earnings and expense regardless of the ownership share. Ira Smilovitz ________________________________ See what's free at AOL.com <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000503> . > Therefore at any time during the six month period, the member value is > $30,450. snip > If you add this to the new members account, he purchases extra units and > his > member value is more than the current members. Hi Arthur, And so goes unit-based accounting. As long as you continue to submit equal amounts of money, and DON'T buy any stock, the value of your members' accounts will remain constant. But as the market ebbs and flows, so will the value if each members' account--on a daily basis! So your first statement is incorrect, even though we understand your point. Even if two members deposit the exact same amount of money, but it's deposited two days apart, that's enough to create a disparity between them forever. I understand what you are trying to do. But it's not the best way, and in fact, it's not the simplest way. The whole point of using bivio's software is to handle the calculations properly (for your members AND the IRS) so you don't have to go through all these gyrations with the finances. The program operates the same as all the mutual fund programs, calculating NAV and member values, etc. Your method won't take into consideration time value and market conditions, which means your members' values won't be properly calculated over time. That's unfair to them. Utilizing unit-based, time-based accounting doesn't mean you have to toss out your method of submitting pre-payments. But being "equal" is absolutely pointless in the long run. There's a reason why 99.9% of thousands of clubs use this system. We've tried it your way and it didn't work out in the end. Make life easier on yourself, Arthur, and your club members. Let the software do its job, and make it affordable for new members to come into the club. You'll be glad you did, later on when you start losing founding members. Lynn Ostrem, VP garbagecop@earthlink.net Crow River Investment Club www.bivio.com/crowriver Arthur,
I agree with the comments made by the others, but I also
recognize that your question was not answered. I don't understand why, if all
members pay semi-annually, you bother to apply each months portion of those
semi-annual payments to dues. Why not just enter them as dues when received? It
would save you a lot of work, and your results would be the same. If you did
that, a new member would pay in the amount shown on the latest Member's Status
report, and that would be the end of it. Then he would make his next semi-annual
payment when the others do.
If you continue the way you are doing it. The member would
pay in the amount shown on the member's status report. In addition he would pay
in an amount equal to the prepaid portion of the dues that the other members
have. You would never enter this as misc income. I assume that when your other
members pay in, you are not awarding them units. Where are you entering the
prepayment? The new members prepayment should be handled the same
way.
Rip West Saint Paul, MN Thanks for your input.
The way I see it, the semi-annual payments really aren't
"dues", but an addition to each members equity. Every six months their
equity increases by the amount of the dues. Therefore, anytime a new member
joins, he should pay the member value at the time of
joining.
Its the other members who say that newcomers should pay
their proportion share of the accrued "dues". By doing this, the new members own
more shares that the older members, and this is is my
difficulty.
What is your opinion?
Arthur Klages From: club_cafe@bivio.com [mailto:club_cafe@bivio.com] On Behalf Of Rip West Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 2:12 PM To: The Club Cafe Subject: Re: club_cafe: Prepaid Dues Arthur,
I agree with the comments made by the others, but I also
recognize that your question was not answered. I don't understand why, if all
members pay semi-annually, you bother to apply each months portion of those
semi-annual payments to dues. Why not just enter them as dues when received? It
would save you a lot of work, and your results would be the same. If you did
that, a new member would pay in the amount shown on the latest Member's Status
report, and that would be the end of it. Then he would make his next semi-annual
payment when the others do.
If you continue the way you are doing it. The member would
pay in the amount shown on the member's status report. In addition he would pay
in an amount equal to the prepaid portion of the dues that the other members
have. You would never enter this as misc income. I assume that when your other
members pay in, you are not awarding them units. Where are you entering the
prepayment? The new members prepayment should be handled the same
way.
Rip West Saint Paul, MN Arthur,
There is still a piece of the puzzle missing. When your
members pay in their semi-annual payment, what entry do you make. Do you record
it as a payment, and give them units at that time? What entries do you make to
prepaid dues, and what monthly entries do you make to relieve prepaid dues. I
can't help but think that you are making more work out of this than
necessary.
I agree with you that the result should not be that the
new member has more units than the others, but I am not sure that I agree that
they should not pay their share of the accrued dues. I just need to know exactly
how you are accounting for this to be able to answer.
Rip West Saint Paul, MN Arthur, you really are making way too much work for
yourself. It is fine to have member investments come in just twice a
year, and not a reason in the world not to post them as payments buying them
units then and there. After all, the club has the money and will be
using it, and it is no longer in their own checking accounts.
As for new members buying in, trying to have equal
members is futility, once you take in the first new member. Member
contributions start earning value from the time they are contributed, (if posted
then, that is). There is no way, even using the same amount, to have
members coming in later get the same number of units for the same amount of
money. Unit values change each and every month, and correspondingly buy
different amounts of units. That is what the unit value system that
all club accounting programs are based on is for, so you don't have to jump
through hoops to figure out what is fair.
Post contributions when paid, forget 'equality',
decide to let new members come on board with whatever initial payment they can
be comfortable with. It doesn't have to try to match original
members. Our club only requires one month payment, though some
choose to put in more, and a small new member fee.
Gene Rooks, Space Coast Chapter, Accounting
Instructor |
|