Paying off withdrawing members
HelpRegister |
Paying off withdrawing members Our club pays withdrawing members in cash. The idea of paying them with stock seemed odd and cumbersome, and I wondered why anyone would bother. Rip West enlightened me with a comment he made in a recent discussion here. Selling stock to pay the withdrawing member is a taxable event, with tax consequences for all club members. Transferring stock ownership is not. Aha! Still, I suppose paying off in cash is a lot simpler from the accounting standpoint. (Isn't it?) And there would need to be a method for choosing which stock(s) to transfer? (But then, we need to choose which to sell, anyway, if we pay in cash.) I wonder if there's been a discussion or magazine article somewhere of the pros & cons of the different payoff methods. I'd be grateful for any pointers. Mike Carroll Mike, the stock to transfer would be stock that has made good gains, thereby deferring (but not avoiding) taxes on that gain for both the club's increased value because of it, and the withdrawing member getting it at a different tax basis, that won't become his capital gain until he sells it. My overall take is that a withdrawal of a significant member is a good time to study and rebalance your portfolio. As mentioned above, you can transfer all, or only part, of a highly appreciated holding, that may be too much of your portfolio, and even may be near it's peak, with little upside left. You can also sell at this time losing stocks, or sluggish performers whose fundamentals don't look promising, for more cash. Whatever you do, do what leaves your portfolio in a more balanced state, with more upside all around. Wish I could show you the performance chart of our club before and after we had to trim our overall value 45% to pay out five withdrawals at once. We had been bobbling along unremarkably, after the pruning our performance shot up dramatically due to the weeding and feeding we did. Gene Rooks, SWIM club, Orlando Mike,
Still, I suppose paying off in cash is a lot
simpler from the accounting standpoint. (Isn't it?)
From the accounting standpoint, it's just about as simple to use stock as cash. From a logistic standpoint, it takes a little more to get your broker to transfer the stock. And there would need to be a method for
choosing which stock(s) to transfer?
When I first started using this method, we would make a
detailed study about rebalancing, etc before we chose. We finally figured out
that we might as well use the most appreciated stocks, to give us the best tax
result, and then to rebalance by either buying more of that stock or others, as
prudent investment analysis dictated.
Rip West Saint Paul, MN Rip West wrote: > Mike, > > Still, I suppose paying off in cash is a lot > simpler from the accounting standpoint. (Isn't it?) > > From > the accounting standpoint, it's just about as simple to use stock as cash. From > a logistic standpoint, it takes a little more to get your broker to transfer the > stock. I have found it to be very simple to transfer stock. My club uses Ameritrade. The withdrawing partner needs to open an account with Ameritrade, which takes about 48 hours to open it online. Then I go to Ameritrade's website and fill out an online form, print the form, sign it, and fax it to Ameritrade. The stock is transfered in the withdrawing partner's account in 3 to 4 business days later. Debi Gene & others, Ok, this is sounding like it's not as complicated as I thought, provided the broker will cooperate. I see that bivio would let me record, when a member withdraws, that he was paid by transferring stock. One piece I don't get is Gene's comment that the club is "deferring (but not avoiding) taxes on that gain for ... the club's increased value." Deferring until when? If the stock is transferred, how & when is the club's gain and its tax on the gain calculated? If it's only deferred until the taxes are calculated for the year in which the transfer occurred, how does that differ from selling the stock & giving the withdrawing member the proceeds? I'm still missing a piece of the puzzle. Mike |
|