Communications
club_cafe
HelpRegister
Stock Evaluation
My club is currentlly in the process of revising and
reframing our stock evaluation sheet. We rejected the
SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the ladies just couldn't get
the hang of it. Our current form (that we put together
ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining
what those numbers mean.

Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of
criteria that one should use when choosing a stock for
purchase?

Thanks for your help.
Marcia D. of Wi$eWomen
>My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our stock
evaluation sheet. We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the
ladies just couldn't get the hang of it. Our current form (that we put
together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining
what those numbers mean.

>Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that one
should use when choosing a stock for purchase?


Marcia,

At www.manifestinvesting.com, we believe that the projected annual return
(PAR) and quality rating for a company are the key characteristics for
evaluating investments or portfolios.

I know that you've explored MANIFEST in the past and would be interested in
any feedback that you may have to offer. (I've also reopened and extended
your trial so you can "continue your test drive.")

Our experience with investment clubs struggling with this challenge has been
quite positive.

Let me know if you have any questions.


Best regards,

Mark Robertson
www.manifestinvesting.com


Note: www.manifestinvesting.com is a subscription site ($89/year) that
includes an e-newsletter, screening, stock analysis and portfolio design &
management tools. The site offers a FREE 30-day full feature "test drive"
and we don't ask for a security deposit or credit card before handing over
the keys to the ignition.
PLEASE DO NOT EMAIL ME ANYMORE



Thanks,
Philip Curtis





>From: "Mark Robertson" <robertson_mark@comcast.net>
>Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
>To: "'The Club Cafe'" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
>Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation
>Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:42:50 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from www2.bivio.com ([216.87.82.68]) by
>bay0-mc7-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed,
>16 Aug 2006 07:41:01 -0700
>Received: from m4f.bivio.com (m4f.bivio.com [192.168.2.9])by www2.bivio.com
>(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GEeds02928;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:39 -0600
>Received: (from apache@localhost)by m4f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
>k7GEeb214651;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:37 -0600
>X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2B1lWNHcgJisOke/vovc5B8j+GLgXvw98=
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
>Thread-Index: AcbBP4VKVtWSITQgRhGsxZzNLtaNHAAAYBaQ
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on www2.bivio.com
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
>DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID
>autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
>X-Spam-Level: ***
>Organization: http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe
>X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1
>Return-Path: robertson_mark@comcast.net
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 14:41:01.0494 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[FE965D60:01C6C141]
>
> >My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our stock
>evaluation sheet. We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the
>ladies just couldn't get the hang of it. Our current form (that we put
>together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining
>what those numbers mean.
>
> >Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that one
>should use when choosing a stock for purchase?
>
>
>Marcia,
>
>At www.manifestinvesting.com, we believe that the projected annual return
>(PAR) and quality rating for a company are the key characteristics for
>evaluating investments or portfolios.
>
>I know that you've explored MANIFEST in the past and would be interested in
>any feedback that you may have to offer. (I've also reopened and extended
>your trial so you can "continue your test drive.")
>
>Our experience with investment clubs struggling with this challenge has
>been
>quite positive.
>
>Let me know if you have any questions.
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>Mark Robertson
>www.manifestinvesting.com
>
>
>Note: www.manifestinvesting.com is a subscription site ($89/year) that
>includes an e-newsletter, screening, stock analysis and portfolio design &
>management tools. The site offers a FREE 30-day full feature "test drive"
>and we don't ask for a security deposit or credit card before handing over
>the keys to the ignition.
>
>
>
>
DONT SEND ME ANYMORE EMAILS



Thanks,
Philip Curtis





>From: "Mark Robertson" <robertson_mark@comcast.net>
>Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
>To: "'The Club Cafe'" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
>Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation
>Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:42:50 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from www2.bivio.com ([216.87.82.68]) by
>bay0-mc7-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed,
>16 Aug 2006 07:41:01 -0700
>Received: from m4f.bivio.com (m4f.bivio.com [192.168.2.9])by www2.bivio.com
>(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GEeds02928;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:39 -0600
>Received: (from apache@localhost)by m4f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
>k7GEeb214651;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:37 -0600
>X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2B1lWNHcgJisOke/vovc5B8j+GLgXvw98=
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
>Thread-Index: AcbBP4VKVtWSITQgRhGsxZzNLtaNHAAAYBaQ
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on www2.bivio.com
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
>DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID
>autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
>X-Spam-Level: ***
>Organization: http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe
>X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1
>Return-Path: robertson_mark@comcast.net
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 14:41:01.0494 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[FE965D60:01C6C141]
>
> >My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our stock
>evaluation sheet. We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the
>ladies just couldn't get the hang of it. Our current form (that we put
>together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining
>what those numbers mean.
>
> >Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that one
>should use when choosing a stock for purchase?
>
>
>Marcia,
>
>At www.manifestinvesting.com, we believe that the projected annual return
>(PAR) and quality rating for a company are the key characteristics for
>evaluating investments or portfolios.
>
>I know that you've explored MANIFEST in the past and would be interested in
>any feedback that you may have to offer. (I've also reopened and extended
>your trial so you can "continue your test drive.")
>
>Our experience with investment clubs struggling with this challenge has
>been
>quite positive.
>
>Let me know if you have any questions.
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>Mark Robertson
>www.manifestinvesting.com
>
>
>Note: www.manifestinvesting.com is a subscription site ($89/year) that
>includes an e-newsletter, screening, stock analysis and portfolio design &
>management tools. The site offers a FREE 30-day full feature "test drive"
>and we don't ask for a security deposit or credit card before handing over
>the keys to the ignition.
>
>
>
>
All you have to do is log out.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation

DONT SEND ME ANYMORE EMAILS



Thanks,
Philip Curtis





>From: "Mark Robertson" <robertson_mark@comcast.net>
>Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
>To: "'The Club Cafe'" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
>Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation
>Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:42:50 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from www2.bivio.com ([216.87.82.68]) by
>bay0-mc7-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed,
>16 Aug 2006 07:41:01 -0700
>Received: from m4f.bivio.com (m4f.bivio.com [192.168.2.9])by www2.bivio.com
>(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GEeds02928;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:39 -0600
>Received: (from apache@localhost)by m4f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
>k7GEeb214651;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:37 -0600
>X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2B1lWNHcgJisOke/vovc5B8j+GLgXvw98=
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
>Thread-Index: AcbBP4VKVtWSITQgRhGsxZzNLtaNHAAAYBaQ
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on www2.bivio.com
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
>DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID 
>autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
>X-Spam-Level: ***
>Organization: http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe
>X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1
>Return-Path: robertson_mark@comcast.net
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 14:41:01.0494 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[FE965D60:01C6C141]
>
> >My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our stock
>evaluation sheet.     We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the
>ladies just couldn't get the hang of it.   Our current form (that we put
>together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining
>what those numbers mean.
>
> >Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that one
>should use when choosing a stock for purchase?
>
>
>Marcia,
>
>At www.manifestinvesting.com, we believe that the projected annual return
>(PAR) and quality rating for a company are the key characteristics for
>evaluating investments or portfolios.
>
>I know that you've explored MANIFEST in the past and would be interested in
>any feedback that you may have to offer.  (I've also reopened and extended
>your trial so you can "continue your test drive.")
>
>Our experience with investment clubs struggling with this challenge has
>been
>quite positive.
>
>Let me know if you have any questions.
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>Mark Robertson
>www.manifestinvesting.com
>
>
>Note: www.manifestinvesting.com is a subscription site ($89/year) that
>includes an e-newsletter, screening, stock analysis and portfolio design &
>management tools.  The site offers a FREE 30-day full feature "test drive"
>and we don't ask for a security deposit or credit card before handing over
>the keys to the ignition.
>
>
>
>


stop sending emails please



Thanks,
Philip Curtis





>From: "philip curtis" <thinkbig1@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
>To: club_cafe@bivio.com
>Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation
>Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:25:19 +0000
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Originating-IP: [216.2.193.1]
>X-Originating-Email: [thinkbig1@hotmail.com]
>X-Sender: thinkbig1@hotmail.com
>Received: from www1.bivio.com ([216.87.82.67]) by
>bay0-mc2-f3.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed, 16
>Aug 2006 08:26:59 -0700
>Received: from m3f.bivio.com (m3f.bivio.com [192.168.2.8])by www1.bivio.com
>(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GFPZ919370;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:25:35 -0600
>Received: (from apache@localhost)by m3f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
>k7GFPWD20585;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:25:32 -0600
>X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt1wMQV8AzoKc4CBbrnY8snn29zqOrZL8Jw=
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 15:25:23.0846 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[31790A60:01C6C148]
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on www1.bivio.com
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,
>DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
>X-Spam-Level: *
>Organization: http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe
>X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1
>Return-Path: thinkbig1@hotmail.com
>
>DONT SEND ME ANYMORE EMAILS
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>Philip Curtis
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Mark Robertson" <robertson_mark@comcast.net>
>>Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
>>To: "'The Club Cafe'" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
>>Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation
>>Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:42:50 -0400
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Received: from www2.bivio.com ([216.87.82.68]) by
>>bay0-mc7-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed,
>>16 Aug 2006 07:41:01 -0700
>>Received: from m4f.bivio.com (m4f.bivio.com [192.168.2.9])by
>>www2.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GEeds02928;Wed, 16 Aug 2006
>>08:40:39 -0600
>>Received: (from apache@localhost)by m4f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
>>k7GEeb214651;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:37 -0600
>>X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2B1lWNHcgJisOke/vovc5B8j+GLgXvw98=
>>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
>>Thread-Index: AcbBP4VKVtWSITQgRhGsxZzNLtaNHAAAYBaQ
>>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on www2.bivio.com
>>X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
>>DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID
>>autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
>>X-Spam-Level: ***
>>Organization: http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe
>>X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1
>>Return-Path: robertson_mark@comcast.net
>>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 14:41:01.0494 (UTC)
>>FILETIME=[FE965D60:01C6C141]
>>
>> >My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our stock
>>evaluation sheet. We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the
>>ladies just couldn't get the hang of it. Our current form (that we put
>>together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining
>>what those numbers mean.
>>
>> >Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that one
>>should use when choosing a stock for purchase?
>>
>>
>>Marcia,
>>
>>At www.manifestinvesting.com, we believe that the projected annual return
>>(PAR) and quality rating for a company are the key characteristics for
>>evaluating investments or portfolios.
>>
>>I know that you've explored MANIFEST in the past and would be interested
>>in
>>any feedback that you may have to offer. (I've also reopened and extended
>>your trial so you can "continue your test drive.")
>>
>>Our experience with investment clubs struggling with this challenge has
>>been
>>quite positive.
>>
>>Let me know if you have any questions.
>>
>>
>>Best regards,
>>
>>Mark Robertson
>>www.manifestinvesting.com
>>
>>
>>Note: www.manifestinvesting.com is a subscription site ($89/year) that
>>includes an e-newsletter, screening, stock analysis and portfolio design &
>>management tools. The site offers a FREE 30-day full feature "test drive"
>>and we don't ask for a security deposit or credit card before handing over
>>the keys to the ignition.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
stop sending emails



Thanks,
Philip Curtis





>From: "Marcia De Fren" <marciadefren@msn.com>
>Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
>To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
>Subject: Re: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation
>Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:51:41 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Originating-IP: [69.167.250.64]
>X-Originating-Email: [marciadefren@msn.com]
>X-Sender: marciadefren@msn.com
>Received: from www2.bivio.com ([216.87.82.68]) by
>bay0-mc2-f6.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed, 16
>Aug 2006 08:52:41 -0700
>Received: from m4f.bivio.com (m4f.bivio.com [192.168.2.9])by www2.bivio.com
>(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GFpqs11698;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:51:52 -0600
>Received: (from apache@localhost)by m4f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
>k7GFpqG17618;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:51:52 -0600
>X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt31aN3DZ04sRRxpdqRjr+9OB4HRVtkJZiI=
>References: <BAY113-F349FF19011B9F2429C9894E24C0@phx.gbl>
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: MSN 9
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.20.0029.3000
>Seal-Send-Time: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:51:41 -0400
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 15:51:42.0075 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[DE2BACB0:01C6C14B]
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on www2.bivio.com
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,
>DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER
>autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
>X-Spam-Level: *
>Organization: http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe
>X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1
>Return-Path: marciadefren@msn.com
>
>All you have to do is log out.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: philip curtis<mailto:thinkbig1@hotmail.com>
> To: club_cafe@bivio.com<mailto:club_cafe@bivio.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 11:25 AM
> Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation
>
>
> DONT SEND ME ANYMORE EMAILS
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Philip Curtis
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Mark Robertson"
><robertson_mark@comcast.net<mailto:robertson_mark@comcast.net>>
> >Reply-To: "The Club Cafe"
><club_cafe@bivio.com<mailto:club_cafe@bivio.com>>
> >To: "'The Club Cafe'" <club_cafe@bivio.com<mailto:club_cafe@bivio.com>>
> >Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation
> >Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:42:50 -0400
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Received: from www2.bivio.com ([216.87.82.68]) by
> >bay0-mc7-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444);
>Wed,
> >16 Aug 2006 07:41:01 -0700
> >Received: from m4f.bivio.com (m4f.bivio.com [192.168.2.9])by
>www2.bivio.com
> >(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GEeds02928;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:39
>-0600
> >Received: (from apache@localhost)by<mailto:apache@localhost)by>
>m4f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
> >k7GEeb214651;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:37 -0600
> >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2B1lWNHcgJisOke/vovc5B8j+GLgXvw98=
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
> >Thread-Index: AcbBP4VKVtWSITQgRhGsxZzNLtaNHAAAYBaQ
> >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on
>www2.bivio.com
> >X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
> >DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID
> >autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
> >X-Spam-Level: ***
> >Organization:
>http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe
> >X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1
> >Return-Path:
>robertson_mark@comcast.net<mailto:robertson_mark@comcast.net>
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 14:41:01.0494 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[FE965D60:01C6C141]
> >
> > >My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our
>stock
> >evaluation sheet. We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the
> >ladies just couldn't get the hang of it. Our current form (that we
>put
> >together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining
> >what those numbers mean.
> >
> > >Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that
>one
> >should use when choosing a stock for purchase?
> >
> >
> >Marcia,
> >
> >At www.manifestinvesting.com<http://www.manifestinvesting.com/>, we
>believe that the projected annual return
> >(PAR) and quality rating for a company are the key characteristics for
> >evaluating investments or portfolios.
> >
> >I know that you've explored MANIFEST in the past and would be
>interested in
> >any feedback that you may have to offer. (I've also reopened and
>extended
> >your trial so you can "continue your test drive.")
> >
> >Our experience with investment clubs struggling with this challenge has
> >been
> >quite positive.
> >
> >Let me know if you have any questions.
> >
> >
> >Best regards,
> >
> >Mark Robertson
> >www.manifestinvesting.com
> >
> >
> >Note: www.manifestinvesting.com<http://www.manifestinvesting.com/> is a
>subscription site ($89/year) that
> >includes an e-newsletter, screening, stock analysis and portfolio
>design &
> >management tools. The site offers a FREE 30-day full feature "test
>drive"
> >and we don't ask for a security deposit or credit card before handing
>over
> >the keys to the ignition.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Philip

Stop sending me emails asking to stop sending you emails.

Mike





>From: "philip curtis" <thinkbig1@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
>To: club_cafe@bivio.com
>Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation
>Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:24:11 +0000
>
>PLEASE DO NOT EMAIL ME ANYMORE
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>Philip Curtis
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Mark Robertson" <robertson_mark@comcast.net>
>>Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
>>To: "'The Club Cafe'" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
>>Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation
>>Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:42:50 -0400
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Received: from www2.bivio.com ([216.87.82.68]) by
>>bay0-mc7-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed,
>>16 Aug 2006 07:41:01 -0700
>>Received: from m4f.bivio.com (m4f.bivio.com [192.168.2.9])by
>>www2.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GEeds02928;Wed, 16 Aug 2006
>>08:40:39 -0600
>>Received: (from apache@localhost)by m4f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
>>k7GEeb214651;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:37 -0600
>>X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2B1lWNHcgJisOke/vovc5B8j+GLgXvw98=
>>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
>>Thread-Index: AcbBP4VKVtWSITQgRhGsxZzNLtaNHAAAYBaQ
>>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on www2.bivio.com
>>X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
>>DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID
>>autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
>>X-Spam-Level: ***
>>Organization: http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe
>>X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1
>>Return-Path: robertson_mark@comcast.net
>>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 14:41:01.0494 (UTC)
>>FILETIME=[FE965D60:01C6C141]
>>
>> >My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our stock
>>evaluation sheet. We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the
>>ladies just couldn't get the hang of it. Our current form (that we put
>>together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining
>>what those numbers mean.
>>
>> >Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that one
>>should use when choosing a stock for purchase?
>>
>>
>>Marcia,
>>
>>At www.manifestinvesting.com, we believe that the projected annual return
>>(PAR) and quality rating for a company are the key characteristics for
>>evaluating investments or portfolios.
>>
>>I know that you've explored MANIFEST in the past and would be interested
>>in
>>any feedback that you may have to offer. (I've also reopened and extended
>>your trial so you can "continue your test drive.")
>>
>>Our experience with investment clubs struggling with this challenge has
>>been
>>quite positive.
>>
>>Let me know if you have any questions.
>>
>>
>>Best regards,
>>
>>Mark Robertson
>>www.manifestinvesting.com
>>
>>
>>Note: www.manifestinvesting.com is a subscription site ($89/year) that
>>includes an e-newsletter, screening, stock analysis and portfolio design &
>>management tools. The site offers a FREE 30-day full feature "test drive"
>>and we don't ask for a security deposit or credit card before handing over
>>the keys to the ignition.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Mark -
I tried to open the site and it would not recognize my old password.   Do I re-enroll for a new 30-day "test drive?"
Marcia
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 10:42 AM
Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation

>My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our stock
evaluation sheet.     We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the
ladies just couldn't get the hang of it.   Our current form (that we put
together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining
what those numbers mean.

>Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that one
should use when choosing a stock for purchase?


Marcia,

At www.manifestinvesting.com, we believe that the projected annual return
(PAR) and quality rating for a company are the key characteristics for
evaluating investments or portfolios.

I know that you've explored MANIFEST in the past and would be interested in
any feedback that you may have to offer.  (I've also reopened and extended
your trial so you can "continue your test drive.")

Our experience with investment clubs struggling with this challenge has been
quite positive. 

Let me know if you have any questions. 


Best regards,

Mark Robertson
www.manifestinvesting.com


Note: www.manifestinvesting.com is a subscription site ($89/year) that
includes an e-newsletter, screening, stock analysis and portfolio design &
management tools.  The site offers a FREE 30-day full feature "test drive"
and we don't ask for a security deposit or credit card before handing over
the keys to the ignition.