Stock Evaluation
HelpRegister |
Stock Evaluation My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our stock evaluation sheet. We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the ladies just couldn't get the hang of it. Our current form (that we put together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining what those numbers mean. Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that one should use when choosing a stock for purchase? Thanks for your help. Marcia D. of Wi$eWomen >My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our stock evaluation sheet. We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the ladies just couldn't get the hang of it. Our current form (that we put together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining what those numbers mean. >Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that one should use when choosing a stock for purchase? Marcia, At www.manifestinvesting.com, we believe that the projected annual return (PAR) and quality rating for a company are the key characteristics for evaluating investments or portfolios. I know that you've explored MANIFEST in the past and would be interested in any feedback that you may have to offer. (I've also reopened and extended your trial so you can "continue your test drive.") Our experience with investment clubs struggling with this challenge has been quite positive. Let me know if you have any questions. Best regards, Mark Robertson www.manifestinvesting.com Note: www.manifestinvesting.com is a subscription site ($89/year) that includes an e-newsletter, screening, stock analysis and portfolio design & management tools. The site offers a FREE 30-day full feature "test drive" and we don't ask for a security deposit or credit card before handing over the keys to the ignition. PLEASE DO NOT EMAIL ME ANYMORE Thanks, Philip Curtis >From: "Mark Robertson" <robertson_mark@comcast.net> >Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com> >To: "'The Club Cafe'" <club_cafe@bivio.com> >Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation >Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:42:50 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from www2.bivio.com ([216.87.82.68]) by >bay0-mc7-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed, >16 Aug 2006 07:41:01 -0700 >Received: from m4f.bivio.com (m4f.bivio.com [192.168.2.9])by www2.bivio.com >(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GEeds02928;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:39 -0600 >Received: (from apache@localhost)by m4f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id >k7GEeb214651;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:37 -0600 >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2B1lWNHcgJisOke/vovc5B8j+GLgXvw98= >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 >Thread-Index: AcbBP4VKVtWSITQgRhGsxZzNLtaNHAAAYBaQ >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on www2.bivio.com >X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, >DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID >autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 >X-Spam-Level: *** >Organization: http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe >X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1 >Return-Path: robertson_mark@comcast.net >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 14:41:01.0494 (UTC) >FILETIME=[FE965D60:01C6C141] > > >My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our stock >evaluation sheet. We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the >ladies just couldn't get the hang of it. Our current form (that we put >together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining >what those numbers mean. > > >Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that one >should use when choosing a stock for purchase? > > >Marcia, > >At www.manifestinvesting.com, we believe that the projected annual return >(PAR) and quality rating for a company are the key characteristics for >evaluating investments or portfolios. > >I know that you've explored MANIFEST in the past and would be interested in >any feedback that you may have to offer. (I've also reopened and extended >your trial so you can "continue your test drive.") > >Our experience with investment clubs struggling with this challenge has >been >quite positive. > >Let me know if you have any questions. > > >Best regards, > >Mark Robertson >www.manifestinvesting.com > > >Note: www.manifestinvesting.com is a subscription site ($89/year) that >includes an e-newsletter, screening, stock analysis and portfolio design & >management tools. The site offers a FREE 30-day full feature "test drive" >and we don't ask for a security deposit or credit card before handing over >the keys to the ignition. > > > > DONT SEND ME ANYMORE EMAILS Thanks, Philip Curtis >From: "Mark Robertson" <robertson_mark@comcast.net> >Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com> >To: "'The Club Cafe'" <club_cafe@bivio.com> >Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation >Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:42:50 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from www2.bivio.com ([216.87.82.68]) by >bay0-mc7-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed, >16 Aug 2006 07:41:01 -0700 >Received: from m4f.bivio.com (m4f.bivio.com [192.168.2.9])by www2.bivio.com >(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GEeds02928;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:39 -0600 >Received: (from apache@localhost)by m4f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id >k7GEeb214651;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:37 -0600 >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2B1lWNHcgJisOke/vovc5B8j+GLgXvw98= >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 >Thread-Index: AcbBP4VKVtWSITQgRhGsxZzNLtaNHAAAYBaQ >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on www2.bivio.com >X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, >DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID >autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 >X-Spam-Level: *** >Organization: http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe >X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1 >Return-Path: robertson_mark@comcast.net >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 14:41:01.0494 (UTC) >FILETIME=[FE965D60:01C6C141] > > >My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our stock >evaluation sheet. We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the >ladies just couldn't get the hang of it. Our current form (that we put >together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining >what those numbers mean. > > >Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that one >should use when choosing a stock for purchase? > > >Marcia, > >At www.manifestinvesting.com, we believe that the projected annual return >(PAR) and quality rating for a company are the key characteristics for >evaluating investments or portfolios. > >I know that you've explored MANIFEST in the past and would be interested in >any feedback that you may have to offer. (I've also reopened and extended >your trial so you can "continue your test drive.") > >Our experience with investment clubs struggling with this challenge has >been >quite positive. > >Let me know if you have any questions. > > >Best regards, > >Mark Robertson >www.manifestinvesting.com > > >Note: www.manifestinvesting.com is a subscription site ($89/year) that >includes an e-newsletter, screening, stock analysis and portfolio design & >management tools. The site offers a FREE 30-day full feature "test drive" >and we don't ask for a security deposit or credit card before handing over >the keys to the ignition. > > > > All you have to do is log out.
stop sending emails please Thanks, Philip Curtis >From: "philip curtis" <thinkbig1@hotmail.com> >Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com> >To: club_cafe@bivio.com >Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation >Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:25:19 +0000 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >X-Originating-IP: [216.2.193.1] >X-Originating-Email: [thinkbig1@hotmail.com] >X-Sender: thinkbig1@hotmail.com >Received: from www1.bivio.com ([216.87.82.67]) by >bay0-mc2-f3.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed, 16 >Aug 2006 08:26:59 -0700 >Received: from m3f.bivio.com (m3f.bivio.com [192.168.2.8])by www1.bivio.com >(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GFPZ919370;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:25:35 -0600 >Received: (from apache@localhost)by m3f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id >k7GFPWD20585;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:25:32 -0600 >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt1wMQV8AzoKc4CBbrnY8snn29zqOrZL8Jw= >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 15:25:23.0846 (UTC) >FILETIME=[31790A60:01C6C148] >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on www1.bivio.com >X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, >DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 >X-Spam-Level: * >Organization: http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe >X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1 >Return-Path: thinkbig1@hotmail.com > >DONT SEND ME ANYMORE EMAILS > > > >Thanks, >Philip Curtis > > > > > >>From: "Mark Robertson" <robertson_mark@comcast.net> >>Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com> >>To: "'The Club Cafe'" <club_cafe@bivio.com> >>Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation >>Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:42:50 -0400 >>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>Received: from www2.bivio.com ([216.87.82.68]) by >>bay0-mc7-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed, >>16 Aug 2006 07:41:01 -0700 >>Received: from m4f.bivio.com (m4f.bivio.com [192.168.2.9])by >>www2.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GEeds02928;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 >>08:40:39 -0600 >>Received: (from apache@localhost)by m4f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id >>k7GEeb214651;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:37 -0600 >>X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2B1lWNHcgJisOke/vovc5B8j+GLgXvw98= >>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 >>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 >>Thread-Index: AcbBP4VKVtWSITQgRhGsxZzNLtaNHAAAYBaQ >>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on www2.bivio.com >>X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, >>DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID >>autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 >>X-Spam-Level: *** >>Organization: http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe >>X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1 >>Return-Path: robertson_mark@comcast.net >>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 14:41:01.0494 (UTC) >>FILETIME=[FE965D60:01C6C141] >> >> >My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our stock >>evaluation sheet. We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the >>ladies just couldn't get the hang of it. Our current form (that we put >>together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining >>what those numbers mean. >> >> >Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that one >>should use when choosing a stock for purchase? >> >> >>Marcia, >> >>At www.manifestinvesting.com, we believe that the projected annual return >>(PAR) and quality rating for a company are the key characteristics for >>evaluating investments or portfolios. >> >>I know that you've explored MANIFEST in the past and would be interested >>in >>any feedback that you may have to offer. (I've also reopened and extended >>your trial so you can "continue your test drive.") >> >>Our experience with investment clubs struggling with this challenge has >>been >>quite positive. >> >>Let me know if you have any questions. >> >> >>Best regards, >> >>Mark Robertson >>www.manifestinvesting.com >> >> >>Note: www.manifestinvesting.com is a subscription site ($89/year) that >>includes an e-newsletter, screening, stock analysis and portfolio design & >>management tools. The site offers a FREE 30-day full feature "test drive" >>and we don't ask for a security deposit or credit card before handing over >>the keys to the ignition. >> >> >> >> > > stop sending emails Thanks, Philip Curtis >From: "Marcia De Fren" <marciadefren@msn.com> >Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com> >To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com> >Subject: Re: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation >Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:51:41 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >X-Originating-IP: [69.167.250.64] >X-Originating-Email: [marciadefren@msn.com] >X-Sender: marciadefren@msn.com >Received: from www2.bivio.com ([216.87.82.68]) by >bay0-mc2-f6.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed, 16 >Aug 2006 08:52:41 -0700 >Received: from m4f.bivio.com (m4f.bivio.com [192.168.2.9])by www2.bivio.com >(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GFpqs11698;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:51:52 -0600 >Received: (from apache@localhost)by m4f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id >k7GFpqG17618;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:51:52 -0600 >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt31aN3DZ04sRRxpdqRjr+9OB4HRVtkJZiI= >References: <BAY113-F349FF19011B9F2429C9894E24C0@phx.gbl> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: MSN 9 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.20.0029.3000 >Seal-Send-Time: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:51:41 -0400 >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 15:51:42.0075 (UTC) >FILETIME=[DE2BACB0:01C6C14B] >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on www2.bivio.com >X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, >DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER >autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 >X-Spam-Level: * >Organization: http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe >X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1 >Return-Path: marciadefren@msn.com > >All you have to do is log out. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: philip curtis<mailto:thinkbig1@hotmail.com> > To: club_cafe@bivio.com<mailto:club_cafe@bivio.com> > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 11:25 AM > Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation > > > DONT SEND ME ANYMORE EMAILS > > > > Thanks, > Philip Curtis > > > > > > >From: "Mark Robertson" ><robertson_mark@comcast.net<mailto:robertson_mark@comcast.net>> > >Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" ><club_cafe@bivio.com<mailto:club_cafe@bivio.com>> > >To: "'The Club Cafe'" <club_cafe@bivio.com<mailto:club_cafe@bivio.com>> > >Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation > >Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:42:50 -0400 > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > >Received: from www2.bivio.com ([216.87.82.68]) by > >bay0-mc7-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); >Wed, > >16 Aug 2006 07:41:01 -0700 > >Received: from m4f.bivio.com (m4f.bivio.com [192.168.2.9])by >www2.bivio.com > >(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GEeds02928;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:39 >-0600 > >Received: (from apache@localhost)by<mailto:apache@localhost)by> >m4f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id > >k7GEeb214651;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:37 -0600 > >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2B1lWNHcgJisOke/vovc5B8j+GLgXvw98= > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 > >Thread-Index: AcbBP4VKVtWSITQgRhGsxZzNLtaNHAAAYBaQ > >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on >www2.bivio.com > >X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, > >DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID > >autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 > >X-Spam-Level: *** > >Organization: >http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe > >X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1 > >Return-Path: >robertson_mark@comcast.net<mailto:robertson_mark@comcast.net> > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 14:41:01.0494 (UTC) > >FILETIME=[FE965D60:01C6C141] > > > > >My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our >stock > >evaluation sheet. We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the > >ladies just couldn't get the hang of it. Our current form (that we >put > >together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining > >what those numbers mean. > > > > >Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that >one > >should use when choosing a stock for purchase? > > > > > >Marcia, > > > >At www.manifestinvesting.com<http://www.manifestinvesting.com/>, we >believe that the projected annual return > >(PAR) and quality rating for a company are the key characteristics for > >evaluating investments or portfolios. > > > >I know that you've explored MANIFEST in the past and would be >interested in > >any feedback that you may have to offer. (I've also reopened and >extended > >your trial so you can "continue your test drive.") > > > >Our experience with investment clubs struggling with this challenge has > >been > >quite positive. > > > >Let me know if you have any questions. > > > > > >Best regards, > > > >Mark Robertson > >www.manifestinvesting.com > > > > > >Note: www.manifestinvesting.com<http://www.manifestinvesting.com/> is a >subscription site ($89/year) that > >includes an e-newsletter, screening, stock analysis and portfolio >design & > >management tools. The site offers a FREE 30-day full feature "test >drive" > >and we don't ask for a security deposit or credit card before handing >over > >the keys to the ignition. > > > > > > > > > > Philip Stop sending me emails asking to stop sending you emails. Mike >From: "philip curtis" <thinkbig1@hotmail.com> >Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com> >To: club_cafe@bivio.com >Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation >Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:24:11 +0000 > >PLEASE DO NOT EMAIL ME ANYMORE > > > >Thanks, >Philip Curtis > > > > > >>From: "Mark Robertson" <robertson_mark@comcast.net> >>Reply-To: "The Club Cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com> >>To: "'The Club Cafe'" <club_cafe@bivio.com> >>Subject: RE: club_cafe: Stock Evaluation >>Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:42:50 -0400 >>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>Received: from www2.bivio.com ([216.87.82.68]) by >>bay0-mc7-f18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed, >>16 Aug 2006 07:41:01 -0700 >>Received: from m4f.bivio.com (m4f.bivio.com [192.168.2.9])by >>www2.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7GEeds02928;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 >>08:40:39 -0600 >>Received: (from apache@localhost)by m4f.bivio.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id >>k7GEeb214651;Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:40:37 -0600 >>X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2B1lWNHcgJisOke/vovc5B8j+GLgXvw98= >>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 >>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 >>Thread-Index: AcbBP4VKVtWSITQgRhGsxZzNLtaNHAAAYBaQ >>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on www2.bivio.com >>X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, >>DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID >>autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 >>X-Spam-Level: *** >>Organization: http://www.bivio.com/club_cafe >>X-Bivio-Forwarded: 1 >>Return-Path: robertson_mark@comcast.net >>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2006 14:41:01.0494 (UTC) >>FILETIME=[FE965D60:01C6C141] >> >> >My club is currentlly in the process of revising and reframing our stock >>evaluation sheet. We rejected the SSG of NAIC a long time ago - the >>ladies just couldn't get the hang of it. Our current form (that we put >>together ourselves) relies too heavily on numbers, without explaining >>what those numbers mean. >> >> >Does anyone out there have a simple form or a set of criteria that one >>should use when choosing a stock for purchase? >> >> >>Marcia, >> >>At www.manifestinvesting.com, we believe that the projected annual return >>(PAR) and quality rating for a company are the key characteristics for >>evaluating investments or portfolios. >> >>I know that you've explored MANIFEST in the past and would be interested >>in >>any feedback that you may have to offer. (I've also reopened and extended >>your trial so you can "continue your test drive.") >> >>Our experience with investment clubs struggling with this challenge has >>been >>quite positive. >> >>Let me know if you have any questions. >> >> >>Best regards, >> >>Mark Robertson >>www.manifestinvesting.com >> >> >>Note: www.manifestinvesting.com is a subscription site ($89/year) that >>includes an e-newsletter, screening, stock analysis and portfolio design & >>management tools. The site offers a FREE 30-day full feature "test drive" >>and we don't ask for a security deposit or credit card before handing over >>the keys to the ignition. >> >> >> >> > > Mark -
I tried to open the site and it would not recognize my old
password. Do I re-enroll for a new 30-day "test drive?"
Marcia
|
|