The need for financial advice may be more psychological than practical
HelpRegister |
The need for financial advice may be more psychological than practical Nice article in The Economist about expert advice: http://www.economist.com/node/21556625 If you don't know about Tetlock's work, you should. There's a human instinct for explanations, even if they are wrong more often than not. It's good to know why this is, and the book "Thinking, Fast and Slow" is an excellent guide to your brain. Ste The Economist article is a bit contradictory in this regard: "The average active-fund manager fails to beat the stockmarket index; no reliable way has been found for selecting above-average managers in advance." "Some financial advice may be extremely useful. Many advisers steered their clients away from Bernie Madoff’s fraudulent funds. Investors also need to be made aware of the benefits of diversification and of the effect on their portfolios of tax rules and regulations. There is also evidence that market valuations revert to the mean over the long term, so pointing out when markets look historically cheap or dear can help." The people who were steered away from Madoff were just lucky. Those same advisers might have steered people away from, say, Paulson's fund, before the crash, because his returns were too good. Indeed, they were very real returns, unlike Madoff's. Given the information available, it would be hard to distinguish between Paulson and Madoff in the past. While it is a fairly safe bet that funds with +20% returns will regress towards the mean, you can't really know when. Any bear following Apple was saying that the iPod was a one shot. Reality is that they were wrong, and they continue to be wrong. And, any bear following AOL in the 90's would have been right, but only after 2001. I guess the Delphi of Oracle would not have predicted the Greek crisis either. :) Cheers, Rob > Delphi of Oracle Oracle of Delphi. It's all Greek to me. Cheers, Rob |
|